to reach agreement on a subject on which people had differing opinions on an agreement, or to end an argument with someone to do something like an agreement or agreement where both parties get an advantage or advantage to agree to be part of a formal agreement or contract to make a win/deal/agreement/agreement, etc., safe or complete, although great attention has been attracted to many communities in the recent literature of artificial intelligence and knowledge representation, the results of these surveys depend on the number of agents involved. The mechanism for obtaining agreement has been widely studied in the theatre-like gaming community, but only for quantitative objects that need to be negotiated. In this paper, we address the problem of defining a general framework that can be used to formalize the steps that lead two officers in one case or a group of more than two officers in the other to reach agreement on the meaning of a number of terms. In particular, we define once we have defined a logical framework to represent the situation of two agents negotiating, an algorithm that automates the meaning negotiation process, and study its computational properties. We expand the algorithm to a framework where there are more than two bargaining agents. “Affect” vs. “Effect”: Use the right word every time transactions on Intelligence Collective VII Pp 1-42 Quote “Stuffing” vs. “Dressing”: Do you know the difference? . To get something, after discussing it or thinking long and hard, “Epidemic” versus “Pandemic” versus “Endemic”: What do these terms mean? .

. . . Индекс слова: 1-300, 301-600, 601-900, Больше Результатов: 178. Точных совпадений: 178. Затраченное время: 136 мс . ..